Summative assessment was administered for Reading with Fun, Entertainment, and Natural Disasters There were 11 students in the class and all were present. The maximum score for the completed work was 24 points
The content of the summative assessment for the 3rd term should be selected on topics “Reading for pleasure” or/and “Entertainment and Media” or/and “Natural Disasters.
Six people managed the assignments with 16-20 points. The rest had papers with low scores of 13-14.
This final paper consists of 14 questions: listening, reading, writing, and speaking. The final assessment for this term uses different types of assignments. Correctly put a specific word while listening to a text…
Open-ended assignments require students to follow assignment instructions and answer questions with words, expressions, and sentences.
Listening (listen carefully twice to the text and answer 6 questions) write down the information
Reading the text and answering the questions after the text in the form of test tasks
Second block of tasks on the text you have read, answer in writing with “yes” or “no” sentences
Write a review of a watched, liked film (indicating the genre of the film, the actors’ names, positive and negative characters of the film, specifically, describing each. Express your personal opinion, what you liked and did not like about the film.
Conversation (using cards with texts to retell, convey the content of the text revealing a particular disaster) on one’s own behalf. As if you yourself were in the middle of a given disaster that happened and tell how it happens, how to get out in this case and what to do. Be able to describe natural phenomena before what happened and what then …
The students who got the maximum score successfully coped with the tasks and had a high level of knowledge assimilation, listened attentively to the teacher and speaker, the students showed good skills of listening to foreign language speech and successfully coped with test tasks based on the text read, answering the questions correctly. The tasks were aimed at independent reading with full understanding of the content of the text.
Activation of the studied vocabulary, development of skills of dialogic and monological speech which promote speaking, which allow to motivate and realize communicative needs of students. Students with increased motivation are able to maintain a conversation, respond appropriately to questions, giving complete specific answers, paying attention to intonation and pronunciation.
The students with an average grade point average cope with the tasks where it was necessary to give a specific answer to the question posed, where it was necessary to choose an answer with explanation, caused difficulties and mistakes. They made mistakes in pronunciation and made sentences with mistakes.
The listening comprehension tasks were successfully completed; listening comprehension and vocabulary training contributed to comprehension of the text. There was insufficient intelligibility of word pronunciation in speaking, language barrier, insufficient vocabulary, as there was no systematic repetition and preparation for lessons that made understanding difficult.
Students who scored low coped with simple assignments, that is, they perform listening assignments following the teacher’s instructions. Answers, as a rule, are brief and characterized by frequent pauses. Attempt some complex grammatical forms, but there may be errors that rarely cause comprehension problems.
Use dictionaries to share and exchange information. Mistakes are frequent and can lead to misunderstandings. Attempts to apply basic sentence forms, but with limited success. Pronunciation may cause some communication difficulties. Does not follow English intonation patterns. Uses a limited range of appropriate vocabulary to suggest their narrow range of knowledge.
Planned Knowledge Correction:
- systematic repetition of the main topics of the section
- individual work with weak students
- repetition of words repeating the thematic material
to continue the systematic preparation for the examination of knowledge in the new format, to take into account the negative aspects of the evaluation, to make a correction taking into account the abilities and age peculiarities
